Marketing attribution means a way of figuring out which marketing efforts (ads, social media, emails) led to a customer taking the desired action.
As B2B buyers’ journeys are getting complex, analysing attributions has become more critical.
Prospects rarely convert after a single touchpoint. They read your blogs, attend a webinar, download a whitepaper, and even ignore a few nurture emails. Finally, they click an ad or type in your URL directly to book a demo.
So when it’s time to measure what actually drove the conversion, which action gets the credit? The final click that led to the form submission (last touch)? Or the last meaningful engagement that showed genuine buying intent (last engagement)?
For teams using HubSpot, this is a daily decision that affects reporting, budget allocation, sales alignment, and campaign optimisation.
Let’s take this discussion further and understand what last touch and last engagement mean, their difference, and how to know which one actually aligns with your goals.
Attribution modelling is HubSpot’s way of helping you identify which marketing efforts actually contribute to a contact becoming a customer. In short, HubSpot gives you the answer to the “what drove this lead and what didn’t contribute” question.
HubSpot attribution models include:
Each model tells a different story. That’s why HubSpot lets you visualise these through multi-touch attribution reports, giving marketers and RevOps leaders a complete and overall view of the journey.
Last touch attribution gives 100% of the credit to the final interaction a lead had before converting, whether that’s booking a meeting, filling out a form, or making a purchase.
For instance:
A prospect finds your company through a blog post, later attends a webinar, and finally clicks on a retargeting ad that takes them to your demo request page. In a last touch model, the retargeting ad gets 100% of the credit for that conversion.
Marketers like it because:
Where it lacks:
So while the last touch attribution model is convenient for reporting, it rarely tells the whole story.
Last engagement attribution assigns credit to the final meaningful action a contact takes before becoming a qualified lead or customer, not just the last click or form fill.
For instance:
A prospect reads multiple blog posts, attends a product webinar, downloads a case study, and a week later, types your website URL directly to request a demo. In this case, the last engagement would credit the case study download as the key touchpoint, not the direct visit.
RevOps likes it because:
Where it lacks:
Still, for teams focused on revenue impact, the last engagement attribution model often tells a more accurate story than the last touch.
At first glance, last touch and last engagement might seem similar; both aim to pinpoint the “final” influence before conversion. But in practice, they can tell two completely different stories about the same deal.
For instance:
Let’s say a lead:
If you’re using last touch attribution, the credit goes to the form submission, which is likely driven by a direct or paid search.
But with the last engagement, the sales email reply or webinar attendance might carry more weight. Those moments showed genuine interest and moved the buyer closer to action.
Your attribution model choice makes a difference because:
And here’s where the conflict arises:
This conflict impacts budgets, strategy, and even team alignment. So, make sure you aren’t choosing the wrong one for your context, as it can lead to over-investing in the wrong places.
Choosing between last touch and last engagement attribution depends on the decision you’re trying to make and what you’re trying to measure.
Choose Last Touch Attribution when:
Choose Last Engagement Attribution when:
In some cases, you’ll want to use both:
In short:
A single click or event rarely closes a deal in B2B. It takes a whole series of meaningful engagements across marketing, sales, and customer service to move a prospect closer to becoming a “customer”.
Clicks show activity, and engagement shows intent. That’s why RevOps teams can’t rely solely on last touch attribution. It may tell you how someone landed on your form, but it won’t tell you why they were ready to fill it out.
For RevOps teams, prioritizing engagement over clicks means:
Therefore, with the last engagement model, instead of just saying, “This ad drove the conversion,” you can say, “This webinar was the turning point that influenced the deal.”
Using HubSpot, you can leverage both engagement models at once. So, if you don’t want to debate over which one is best and leverage the benefits of both metrics, you can follow these setup steps:
Buldok Marketing Pro Tip:
Create a dual-view dashboard in HubSpot, with one widget showing the last touch channel and another showing the last engagement type. This lets you see:
When you combine both, you get attribution that’s accurate and actionable.
In the last touch vs. last engagement debate, there’s no universal winner. It’s all about using each model for the right purpose.
For B2B RevOps, the real power comes from understanding and using both perspectives and balancing the simplicity of last touch with the depth of last engagement.
When combined in HubSpot, these models help you allocate budget confidently, refine content strategies, and prove marketing’s impact across the entire buying journey.
Buldok Marketing specialises in building HubSpot attribution setups that go beyond surface-level metrics. From configuring multi-touch reporting to aligning your sales and marketing data, our experts ensure you get an accurate picture of what drives engagement and conversions.
If you want to set up smarter attribution in HubSpot that captures both clicks and conversations, Buldok Marketing can help you build a reporting framework that your sales and marketing teams actually trust.