Blog

“We automated it” is something a lot of teams say with confidence. A defined workflow on which something moves from A to B is what the majority of people think automation is. On paper, that sounds like progress. But in practice, many of these “automated” systems still rely on someone watching them, fixing edge cases, updating logic, or stepping in when something breaks. That’s where the real difference between “we automated it” and “it runs itself” appears. The first reduces manual steps, while the latter one reduces dependency on constant human supervision. This distinction matters more than ever as teams scale. What feels manageable with a small team quickly turns into friction when volume increases, ownership shifts, or context gets lost. Let’s break down the difference between the two systems and how to build a self-running system that needs minimal or zero human interaction. What Teams Usually Mean When They Say “We Automated It” When most teams say they have automated something, they are usually pointing to a specific task, like: A form submission triggers a workflow. A deal update creates a task. A lead gets routed automatically. And technically, that is automation; something happens without a person clicking a button is the basic form of automation. But if you look a little closer, these setups often come with a hidden reality: someone is still responsible for watching them. Someone checks if the workflow is fired correctly or not, someone fixes records when expected data is not retrieved, while someone updates the logic when a new case appears. It’s because automation works as long as the conditions stay familiar. These systems are built to execute a known path, not to handle variation. That’s why many teams end up with automation systems that don’t truly reduce operational load. We can call such systems semi-automated processes. The Hidden Cost of “Semi-Automation” Semi-automation feels like progress because it removes repetitive manual efforts. But it...